Unexpected approvals
A routine action can quietly grant broader token permissions than the workflow needs.
Gateway Transaction Intelligence
Analyze unsigned transaction intent and receive deterministic pre-sign evidence covering effects, gas, approvals, failures, contract observations, and policy violations.
A sample policy has rejected an unlimited approval. Evidence supports the decision; it does not promise perfect safety.
01Unsigned intent stays separate from signing.
02Deterministic checks produce inspectable evidence.
03Human review remains part of the decision.
Why review before signing
A bot can prepare a valid transaction that still violates its purpose or your policy. Gateway turns the proposed call into structured evidence without claiming to detect every possible blockchain vulnerability.
A routine action can quietly grant broader token permissions than the workflow needs.
Raw calldata rarely explains whether a call is likely to fail—or why.
Fee assumptions can drift from the transaction your automation is actually preparing.
A valid address is not proof that the intended contract or function is being called.
Proxy targets and administrative controls can change the code behind a familiar address.
Token allowances and operator permissions can outlive the transaction that created them.
A technically valid call may still exceed the limits your automated workflow should follow.
Encoded transaction data is difficult to review under time pressure without structured evidence.
How it works
Start with one transaction scenario. Expand into a reusable policy or integration only when the first review proves useful.
Share the intended network, public contract information, expected behavior, and concern—never wallet secrets.
Deterministic simulation and policy checks examine expected effects, permissions, fees, failures, and destination observations.
Review the findings, limitations, and recommended human checks before signing or planning an integration.
What the report examines
Each report separates observed evidence, policy findings, and unresolved limitations so a PROCEED, REVIEW, BLOCK, or INDETERMINATE result stays understandable.
Expected native-asset and token balance changes.
Transfer direction, assets, recipients, and quantities when observable.
Allowance changes, spenders, and unlimited-approval warnings.
Gas estimate, fee assumptions, and notable cost signals.
Failure evidence and available reasons from deterministic simulation.
Code presence and observable destination details.
Supportable proxy, implementation, or administrative observations.
Findings against agreed limits for value, destination, approvals, and behavior.
What was not established and what still needs human review.
Static demonstration
This example uses fictional, pre-generated data. It does not represent a customer, live transaction, prevented loss, or safety guarantee.
The proposed transaction grants the destination contract an unlimited allowance for the demo token. No native asset transfer is expected in this call.
The requested allowance exceeds the exact amount described for the workflow and can remain usable after this transaction.
Estimated usage: 46,000 gas. Fee observations are point-in-time evidence and should be rechecked near signing.
Bytecode is present at the destination. The demonstration evidence does not establish whether every administrative control is acceptable for this workflow.
This static example does not prove future contract behavior, eliminate all blockchain risk, or replace a smart-contract audit and independent operational controls.
Introductory offers
The $149 review is the standardized automatic service. Bot Safety Setup and custom integration remain scope-first so their deliverables match the customer’s actual workflow.
Pre-Sign Transaction Review
introductory price
A focused evidence review for one unsigned Base Sepolia transaction or clearly defined scenario.
Bot Safety Setup
scope confirmed first
Transaction review plus a reusable policy configuration for an agreed automated workflow.
Custom Bot Integration
scope confirmed first
Connect Gateway Transaction Intelligence to your bot or automated EVM transaction workflow.
Who this is for
Designed for developers and small technical teams responsible for what automated EVM workflows prepare, approve, and sign.
Security and privacy boundary
Gateway Transaction Intelligence analyzes unsigned transaction information and relevant public blockchain evidence. It does not connect to your wallet, sign transactions, broadcast transactions, or take custody.
Start a review
The form validates a Base Sepolia transaction, screens for secret-like material, and opens fixed-price PayPal checkout. Verified payment starts the report automatically.
Rejected secret-like content is cleared from the form and is not saved by this site.
Frequently asked questions
No. Never send a private key, seed phrase, recovery phrase, keystore password, or any other wallet secret. The review is designed around unsigned transaction information.
No wallet connection is required for the introductory review. You provide an unsigned transaction or a clear transaction scenario and relevant public contract information.
No. The review does not sign or broadcast transactions and does not take custody of assets.
No. It is a focused pre-sign transaction review, not a smart-contract audit, penetration test, formal verification, or guarantee of safety.
Initial functional-pilot support: Base Sepolia only. Base mainnet and broader EVM support are evaluated per integration and are not currently supported by the pilot.
Yes. Bot Safety Setup adds a reusable policy configuration, and Custom Bot Integration can connect the review boundary to an automated EVM transaction system after scope and network support are confirmed.
A structured evidence report covering expected impact, transfers, approvals, gas, failures, destination observations, policy findings, limitations, and suggested items for human review.
Verified payment starts processing automatically. The private result page updates as the evidence is prepared, and its link is emailed when delivery completes.
Provide the Base Sepolia sender, destination, value, calldata, expected behavior, and the concern you want reviewed. Do not include wallet secrets.
Evidence before signature