Planning Unit Allocation Reconciliation Allocate whole planning units from supplied positive weights and explain each award.
Allocate whole planning units from supplied positive weights and explain each award. The chosen Huntington–Hill method first gives one unit to every participant, then awards each remaining unit to the largest weight/sqrt(a(a+1)) priority for its current allocation a. One to twenty-four participants, total units at least the participant count and at most 256, integer weights one to one million, and one or two independent records. Exact BigInt cross-products compare squared priorities without floating-point roots; an equal priority goes to the earliest supplied participant. The trace retains every award, selected squared priority and complete tied set. A reported allocation is checked for total, minimum-one feasibility and per-participant differences. At most 255 awards and 24 priority comparisons per award. Units describe the supplied planning model and do not establish demand or statutory entitlement. Private JSON report retained for 30 days. One-time USD 9.00 job with no subscription. Uses supplied, authorized, non-sensitive records; no provider lookup, external changes, prediction or operational guarantee. Planning methods are chosen analytical models, with no official election, legal apportionment or fairness certification. Document limits are 36,000 UTF-8 bytes, 6,000 value nodes and depth 24; results are limited to 500,000 bytes. All dimensions, references and work profiles are checked before checkout. Integral report quantities must remain exactly representable; unsupported calculation profiles reject before checkout. Use authorized, non-sensitive data. The report describes supplied records and does not change external systems.
Agent API guide → · Website orders show the report on your private order page.
Your input · JSON Load a small example The complete checkout request must fit within 40,000 UTF-8 bytes. Your input is validated again before an order is created.